Wednesday, 5 November 2025

Student Progress Report - November 2025

How can we at Tāmaki make a difference to the learning for students who are achieving below in literacy?

Literacy Achievement Analysis

Overview
An analysis of student performance data identified a group of students performing below the expected curriculum levels in Reading. The findings indicate that foundational language and literacy development are key contributing factors.

The data suggests that literacy challenges begin at the foundational level and compound over time when not addressed early. Emphasis on early identification, intervention, and consistent monitoring across all year levels—especially in the early years—is essential to lifting overall reading achievement.

Key Findings:

  1. Students Performing Below Expected Levels (Years 4–8):

    • A total of 13 students were identified as working more than two years below the expected curriculum levels in literacy.

    • This indicates significant gaps in foundational literacy skills that have persisted over time.

  2. Early Years Focus (New Entrants & Year 1):

    • The New Entrant and Year 1 cohorts have been a particular focus, as establishing strong literacy foundations in the first year of schooling is critical.

    • Early intervention prioritised to ensure these students develop key reading and language skills and to prevent future learning gaps.

  3. Emerging Concerns (Years 2–3):

    • Within the Year 2/3 class, several students were already beginning to show early signs of falling behind expected literacy benchmarks.

    • This group will require targeted support and monitoring to address gaps before they widen.

  4. There were students who had recently immigrated from other countries and had limited proficiency in the target language (English).


Collaborative Approach to Address Literacy Needs

  • To effectively support such a large group of students, it was essential that we worked collaboratively as a team to target our learners’ specific needs. We formed a dedicated literacy support team comprising teachers and learning assistants to ensure a coordinated and consistent approach.

    Through further reflection, we recognised the importance of adopting a school-wide literacy approach to drive improvement. To achieve this, all learning assistants received training in key literacy strategies, ensuring that everyone shared a common understanding and approach. This alignment meant that all staff were “singing from the same hymn sheet,” working together to strengthen learning outcomes for the students who needed the most support.

Consistency in Literacy Practice and Assessment at Tamaki School

To achieve desired outcomes in literacy, it is essential that all staff adopt a consistent and unified approach. At Tamaki School, we recognized that differing methods across classrooms could hinder student progress and make it difficult to measure growth accurately. Therefore, as part of our literacy improvement strategy, we committed to establishing a shared framework for teaching and assessing literacy.

Leadership in Assessment - Actions Taken
As the leader responsible for literacy assessments, I took proactive steps to ensure consistency across the school. This involved aligning assessment practices, moderating student work, and supporting teachers to understand and apply the same expectations. Through this process, we aimed to create a coherent system where assessment data could reliably inform teaching and contribute to lifting student achievement.

  • Developed and implemented a school-wide literacy assessment plan.

  • BSLA training for all Learning assistants and Teachers

  • Facilitated professional learning sessions to build shared understanding of effective literacy instruction and assessment.

  • Introduced regular moderation meetings to ensure consistency in marking and judgments.

  • Monitored student progress data to identify trends, strengths, and areas for targeted support.

By adopting a consistent approach, we strengthened collaboration among teachers and improved the reliability of literacy data. This has provided a strong foundation for future initiatives aimed at raising student achievement further. The next step is to continue refining our practices through professional dialogue, data analysis, and ongoing reflection.

Talanoa (Learning Background and Transitions)

  • One student has received early interventions in foundational classes (Years 1–3), suggesting a continued need for targeted support and monitoring.

  •  Seven students had immigrated from overseas

  • Two students have experienced school changes, which may have disrupted learning continuity and contributed to gaps in understanding.

  • Three students have been enrolled at our school since they were 5, but continue to perform below curriculum expectations, indicating that ongoing targeted interventions may be required.

  • 10 students in our new entrant class some of who were not school ready

  • 5 students who in a year 2/3 class who had not achieved in their initial years of schooling


Intervention Details - (Double dipping/Dose and Density)

Targeted literacy intervention was provided daily to identified students, with focused activities designed to strengthen their phonics knowledge, reading fluency, and overall literacy skills. The programme aimed to build foundational language skills through consistent, structured practice.

Key activities included:

  • Phonics practice: Daily reinforcement of letter–sound relationships - blends, diagraphs to develop decoding skills and improve reading accuracy.

  • Sight word learning: Regular practice and review of basic sight words to enhance word recognition and reading fluency.

  • Guided reading with phonics-based texts: Students read phonics books designed to introduce new vocabulary and language structures, supported by lesson plans provided at the back of each book.

  • Story reading and comprehension sessions: Each week, the teacher conducted a shared story reading session, followed by comprehension activities such as answering questions, retelling, or summarising the story to strengthen understanding and oral language skills.

  • This structured, daily approach provided students with consistent exposure to essential literacy elements, supporting steady progress in reading confidence and capability.

Student voice collected after 10 weeks of intensive intervention 

"I now know lots more spelling words than before. I don't feel tired and lost when I am writing my story".

"I know how to spell words now, and so I can write my story quickly"

I" know how to break the words into sylables when I come across a difficult word".

"I enjoy reading story books now. My parents have bought me books at home so I can read. My mum is proud of me when I read the books to her".

"I am not bored of reading".

"I can now take the difficult words from the stories that Miss reads and can use difficult words in my writing"

"My teacher says I am doing well and have moved up levels"


After 10 weeks the data for our 14 students was


Key 
1- Needs support
2 - Progressing towards
3 - Proficient
4- Excelling



Data of New Entrant/ Y1 class

Letter Sound Recognition -  100% of the students had strong recognition of letters and sounds compared to 50.5% before intervention.

Phoneme Identity - 92.86% of the students were proficient in phoneme identity compared to 50% before intervention

Phoneme Blending - 71.4% of the students were proficient in phoneme blending compared to 50.2% in the beginning.

Conclusion

- Work as a team
- Have fidelity in the intervention
- Try your best

I am very grateful to be working with teachers and learning assistants who demonstrate all the 3 above and we together have been able to make a huge shift in the learning of our students.

Thanks you to Manaiakalani for providing the platform and giving this opportunity to share our success with professionals from the same field












Monday, 8 September 2025

Shifts after intensive teaching of 10 weeks (Y1-3)

 A key focus during this period was to closely monitor the progress and well-being of our new entrants and Year 1- 3 students. Establishing strong academic and behavioural foundations in Years 1 to 3 is critical to ensuring long-term student success. Early identification and support are essential to prevent the development of "long tails" — where students begin to fall behind and continue to struggle in later years. As such, targeted strategies were implemented to ensure early learners are on track and receiving the necessary support to thrive.


The results below show a considerable shift in 10 weeks. The data shows shifts in

- Letter sound Recognistion

- Initial Phoneme Identity

- Phoneme Blending

- Letter Sound Identity


















Sunday, 22 June 2025

 

Tier 2 Literacy Intervention – Student Data Summary


Programme Focus: Literacy Acceleration for Tier 2 Students
Reporting Period: Mid Term 2, 2025

Overview

A total of 18 students from Year 1 to Year 6 were identified for Tier 2 literacy support. These students were selected based on assessment data and teacher observations indicating a need for targeted, small-group instruction to accelerate foundational literacy skills.

The cohort includes English Language Learners (ELLs), with several students newly arrived in New Zealand. While these students often show strength in their first language, they require support in developing English literacy skills.

Student Profile Summary

CategoryNumber of StudentsComments
Limited English proficiency (new to NZ)5Students have minimal English exposure but are fluent in their first language.
Not ready for formal schooling2Require support with school routines, attention, and early literacy readiness.
Difficulty with letter-sound recognition and sight words8Students show confusion with phonics and have limited fluency with basic sight words.
Strong oral English, weak written English3Students communicate well verbally but struggle with writing skills.

Key Considerations

  • Literacy instruction was designed to meet the diverse needs of this group, including phonemic awareness, oral language, vocabulary development, and early reading strategies.

  • Students were grouped according to their specific learning needs to enable targeted intervention.

  • Interventions were delivered by trained learning assistants under teacher guidance, with a strong emphasis on consistency and modelling.

Monday, 9 June 2025

 Next Steps in Supporting Tier 2 Students

My next step was to identify all our Tier 2 students. The strategy was to accelerate their learning in literacy. It was interesting to see that students from all year levels were identified, and those working at Level 1 of the curriculum were placed into the Tier 2 programme.

This programme was to be run by our teacher aides, so I decided to set up hui with teachers to coordinate our approach. We organised for all Tier 2 students to be withdrawn during the first block of the day to focus on foundational literacy skills.

The most important task for me was to train our learning assistants, prepare resources, and model how to deliver the lessons. This process took around two weeks, during which time our learning assistants gained confidence and capability in taking the lessons themselves.

I must say, our learning assistants were fantastic at picking up new learning and applying it effectively to support students. Considering their level of understanding and enthusiasm, I decided to enrol them in the Best Start Literacy Programme through the University of Canterbury.

This course includes regular weekly Zoom hui for the learning assistants. To ensure this runs effectively, we at Tāmaki have allocated dedicated time for them to attend the sessions and practise completing the required quizzes, which are an essential part of the course.

It’s been very satisfying to see our learning assistants making such a strong effort to upskill themselves while also providing valuable support to our students

Tuesday, 20 May 2025

My Inquiry Question 2025

 

Bridging the Literacy Gap: A Kāhui Ako Teacher’s Inquiry into Foundational Skills, Daily Practice, and Collaborative Support

Introduction
As a Community of Learning (Kāhui Ako) teacher within my school, I’ve been reflecting deeply on the literacy challenges many of our students face. Despite the best efforts of our educators, we continue to see a number of learners—particularly those in Tier 2—struggling to meet expected literacy benchmarks. These aren’t isolated issues. Across schools in our Kāhui Ako, a pattern is emerging.

Addressing this challenge isn’t something that can be done in isolation. Alongside my own teaching inquiry, I’ve also been working closely with our learning support teacher aides—training and supporting them to deliver structured literacy programmes and help accelerate student progress.


Expanded Section: What I'm Trialing

Currently, I’m working with a small group of Tier 2 learners across our Kāhui Ako, trialing the following approaches:

  • Structured Literacy Blocks: Implementing daily 40 minute sessions focused solely on foundational skills, using a scope and sequence to ensure coverage and progression.

  • Learning Support Collaboration: A key part of this work involves our learning support teacher aides. I’m actively training them in the principles and practices of structured literacy so they can deliver targeted support confidently and consistently. This not only increases the impact we can have with students but also builds the capacity and expertise of our support staff.

  • Progress Monitoring: Using short, regular assessments to track growth in specific skill areas, such as phonological awareness or high-frequency word recognition.

  • Reinforcement Activities: Providing take-home resources and in-class activities that link directly to what’s being taught—reinforcing learning across different contexts.

  • Whānau Communication: Exploring ways to better involve whānau in supporting literacy at home, including simple literacy games, story sharing, and feedback loops.

By investing time in upskilling our teacher aides, I believe student outcomes will improve and will also boost the confidence and capability among our support team. Their consistency and relationship with students make them a vital part of this intervention model.


Conclusion 
This journey is ongoing, and I’m excited by the early signs of progress—not just from the students, but also from the learning assistants who are growing in expertise and confidence. Building a culture of shared responsibility and capacity-building has been key.

As a Kāhui Ako, we have the opportunity to share our findings, collaborate across schools, and ensure that no student is left behind because of barriers they couldn’t control. Literacy is not just a subject—it’s the foundation for learning across the curriculum and for lifelong success.

I welcome dialogue with colleagues who are working on similar inquiries. Together, we can deepen our understanding of what works—and, more importantly, why it works—for our learners and for those who support them.